Drawing for INFOBUS

USPTO serial 78570341

INFOBUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFOBUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randall M. Whitmeyer

Randall M. Whitmeyer Hutchison Law Group PLLCSuite 4005410 Trinity RoadRaleigh, NC 27607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009digital video player/recorder and video displays, namely cameras, computer monitors and other computer peripherals for the purpose of providing information to persons occupying various modes of transport; computer software for operating cameras and digital video players for the purpose of providing information to persons occupying various modes of transporACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 28, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance