USPTO serial 78571069
OODLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2009
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with OODLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN MATEO, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
San Mateo, CA
WALNUT, CA
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kieran G. Doyle
Kieran G. Doyle Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th Street21st FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036-1525Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing a searchable online advertising guide featuring the goods and services of others on the internet; advertising and promotion services and related consulting; promoting the goods and services of others by advertising via electronic media, namely, the internet; business referral services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by passing business leads and referrals among affiliate members | ACTIVE | Apr 6, 2005 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR SEARCHING THE CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENTS OF OTHERS; HOSTING CONTENT OF OTHERS ON A WEB SITES | ACTIVE | Apr 6, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OODLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OODLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OODLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CTD Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OODLE HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA VOICES
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OODLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |