USPTO serial 78571072
JACQUELIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3223889Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JACQUELIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold Shokouhi
Arnold Shokoui Shokouhi Law Firm, PLLC700 N. Pearl StreetNorth Tower, Suite 2150Dallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jacquelin Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jacquelin Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jacquelin Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named JACQUELIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |