Drawing for ARX

USPTO serial 78571945

ARX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James W. Hellwege (Reg. No. 28,808)

Rebecca Finkenbinder100 Pine StreetP.O. Box 1166Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, a drug delivery system comprising oral dissolvable or erodable films, containing pharmaceutically-active ingredients for the release of a wide variety of therapeutic agentsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 21, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 21, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 21, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance