USPTO serial 78572328
CARMEL VENTURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARMEL VENTURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LL60 STATE STSTE 25BOSTON, MA 02109-1816Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing venture capital funding in technology companies | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |