USPTO serial 78572334
SEMANTIC-SILICON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEMANTIC-SILICON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, namely integrated circuits; application specific integrated circuits; microprocessors; microprocessor cores; macro cells; microcontrollers; bus interfaces; printed circuit boards; computer software and applications, namely for the use in semantic processing of digital information content, XML content processing, anti-virus processing, intrusion detection processing, OSI Layer 4-7 content processing, semantic processing, URI normalization, data decoding, data parsing processing and data pattern matching processing; Register Transfer Logic (RTL) descriptions of flow processing microprocessors; application programming interfaces, namely for the processing, identification, parsing, rule-based filtering, storage, manipulation of tokens and productions, normalization, establishment a digital pattern signatures, or definition the context, or grammar, of incoming digital traffic flows; drivers, namely for the control of the processing, identification, parsing, rule-based filtering, manipulation of tokens and productions, storage, normalization, establishment a digital pattern signatures, and definition the context, or grammar, of incoming digital traffic flows; firmware, namely to process, identify, parse, filter, store, manipulate, normalize, and recognize a digital pattern signature according to the context, or grammar, of incoming digital traffic flows; computer hardware, computer software and applications, sold as a unit, namely that recognize, parse and semantically process messages, network data traffic or streaming data for use in computers, security sub-systems, networking equipment, namely routers, switches, web-servers, firewalls, or gateways, appliances, namely special-purpose computer systems for defined security, SPAM filtering, SOAP, XMP, financial services, or service-oriented functions; programmable and silicon chips, devices, namely specialized, often single function or embedded, computer systems, gate array, or FPGA versions of gate-level logic, namely for the development, modeling, simulation compiling, debugging, verification, construction, integration, or interfacing with semantic processing, XML content processing, anti-virus processing, intrusion detection processing, OSI Layer 4-7 content processing, URI normalization, data decoding, data parsing processing and data pattern matching processing applications; computer software for the development, testing, programming, and production of the foregoing; computer software for applications that recognize, parse and semantic process messages, network data traffic, and streaming data used in computers, security sub-systems, networking equipment and appliances sold together with electronic and printed user manuals. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |