USPTO serial 78572360
ULTIMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTIMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rick Taché, Michael K. Kelly, Charles F. Hauff, Jr., Howard I. Sobelman, Laura J. Zeman, Sid Leach, R. Lee Fraley, Damon L. Boyd, Cynthia L. Pillote, Daniel R. Pote, David O. Caplan, Wendy S. Neal, John H. Platt, Shahpar Shahpar, Emma C. Harty, Robert
J RICK TACHÉ MICHAEL K KELLY CHARLES SNELL & WILMER LLPONE ARIZONA CTR400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHILI | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |