USPTO serial 78572579
BAYVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3512523Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAYVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Vapnek, Esq.
PAUL W VAPNEK ESQ TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Aluminum foil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Processed food products, namely, canned tuna, canned meat, chili, canned soup and dry soup mixes, evaporated and powdered dry milk, processed nuts in cans or jars, raisins, flaked coconut, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables, namely, applesauce, apricots, fruit cocktail, peaches, pears, pineapple, asparagus, green beans, beets, corn, peas, tomato paste, tomatoes, spinach, mixed vegetables, mushrooms, and potatoes, vegetable oil and shortening, processed pickles, processed green and ripe olives, jellies, jams, fruit preserves, peanut butter, dried beans, fresh and frozen seafood and non-dairy coffee creamer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Tea, coffee, granola bars, ready to eat and hot breakfast or processed cereal, rice, spaghetti, vermicelli, macaroni, and lasagna noodles, packaged dinners consisting primarily of pasta, chocolate chips, marshmallows and marshmallow cream topping, barbecue sauce, catsup, mustard, mustard sauces, spaghetti sauces, vinegar, tomato sauce, honey, pepper, spices, salt, table syrup, vanilla extract, and sugar; salad dressing and mayonnaise | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Super Store Industries
- Other trademarks owned by Super Store Industries
- Other trademarks owned by Super Store Industries
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BAYVIEW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 8, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |