CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for POLEMASTER

USPTO serial 78573065

POLEMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLEMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi A. Schiller

Heidi A. Schiller Suite 1730197 Elm StreetNorthampton, MA 01060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT PROVIDING SUSPENSION FEATURES ERGONOMICALLY DESIGNED FOR COMFORT AND SAFETY FOR A PERSON WORKING OR CLIMBING ON TREES, POLES, MASTS AND TOWERS, NAMELY SADDLES, HARNESSES, LINEMEN'S BELTS, CONNECTING LINKS, WEBBING, CUSHIONING PADS, ROPES, LANYARDS, FLIP LINES AND OTHER CONFIGURATIONS PROVIDING SUSPENSION SUPPORTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 2, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 2, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 1, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 19, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance