USPTO serial 78573629
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tokyo, JP
ABRAMS GENTILE PRODUCTIONS, INC.
NEWARK, DE
TOKYO, 124-8511, JP
TOKYO, 124-8511, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM F. HERBERT
WILLIAM F. HERBERT STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVENUE NWSUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video animation, cartoons, anime and video game software recorded on electronically readable medium, namely video tapes, DVDs, CD ROMs, memory sticks and semiconductor memory chips including solid state pluggable memory chips; and downloadable computer game software | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely comic books and magazines, posters, trading cards and booklets all featuring stories in illustrated form, graphic novels, decals, notebooks, binders, plastic and paper bags and boxes for packaging and written instruction sheets for use with computer and video based games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely, a series of television programs featuring live action characters and animated characters; entertainment, namely a continuing animated and live action show distributed over television, satellite, video and movie media; entertainment, namely, a series of television programs featuring cartoons and anime, and online video computer games | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |