USPTO serial 78573689
HAWAIIAN BODY PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAWAIIAN BODY PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath and body care products for men, women and children, gift baskets, spa products to include-- arm deodorant, baby powder, bath fizzers, bath oils, bath teas, bath vinegars, bath salts, bath milks, body lotions, body butters, body glitters, body oils, body masks, bubble bath, essential oils for personal use, facial masks, facial oils, facial toners, facial exfoliates, facial lotion, facial cleansers, foot scrubs, foot masks, foot fizzers, foot toners, hair vinegars, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hard lotion bars, shower gel, soaps, honey baths, honey scrubs, massage oils, massage bars, salt scrubs, sugar scrubs, shaving gel, shaving lotion, lip balms, and body spritzers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |