Drawing for SPA DU LAC

USPTO serial 78573778

SPA DU LAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPA DU LAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryce K. Earl, Esq.

Bryce K. Earl, Esq. Santoro, Driggs, Walch, Kearney, Holley & Thompson400 South Fourth Street, Third FloorLas Vegas, NV 89101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Bottled distilled drinking water; bottled natural spring, carbonated, sparkling, flavored, mineral and still water; flavored soft drinks; lemonade; fruit drinks; fruit nectars; fruit juice concentrates; fruit juices; syrup and powder concentrates for making fruit juices, fruit drinks and soft drinks; and sports drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 12, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 10, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance