USPTO serial 78573784
GRAN-ITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3203058Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRAN-ITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E Herron II
DAVID E HERRON II LAW OFFICE OF DAVID E HERRON IIPO BOX 2778KANSAS CITY, KS 66110-0778UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Durable polymeric material sold in solid stock shapes for use in making goods such as counter tops, bathroom or kitchen fixtures, flooring, walls, sinks, tubs and showers or the like | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 25, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |