USPTO serial 78573829
PH CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PH CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Vending in the field of healthy food products, On-line retail store services featuring food products, Promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others, Promoting the goods and services of others through infomercials. | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2005 |
| 041 | Publishing and distribution of books, reviews and other printed matter as well as related electronic data carriers including but not limited to television, radio and internet; Education of persons of all ages and learning levels in the field of health and food preparation through online courses, tutorials, correspondence courses, and one-on-one training; Creation, organization and presentation of conferences relating to the field of food preparation and health. | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2005 |
| 043 | Health resort services, namely, providing food and lodging that specialize in promoting patrons' general health and well-being, Spa services, namely, providing temporary accommodations and meals to clients of a health or beauty spa, Catering for the provision of food and beverages, Providing of food and drink for patients and guests. | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2005 |
| 044 | Weight reduction diet planning and supervision, providing health information, health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hiigel, Charles
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PH CHEF
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |