USPTO serial 78574155
EZ CASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EZ CASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC.
ATLANTIC CITY, NJ
RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC.
ATLANTIC CITY, NJ
RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC.
ATLANTIC CITY, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER MICHAEL LAUGHLIN
PETER MICHAEL LAUGHLIN GRAHAM, CURTIN & SHERIDANPO BOX 1991MORRISTOWN, NJ 07962-1991UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING CASINO SERVICES FEATURING MAGNETICALLY-ENCODED STORED-VALUE TICKETS THAT CAN BE USED TO PLAY SLOT MACHINE GAMES OR BE REDEEMED FOR CASH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EZ CASH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |