Drawing for INNER ARMOR

USPTO serial 78574240

INNER ARMOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNER ARMOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard H. Weller, Esq.

HOWARD H WELLER ESQ SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPWACKER DR STATION SEARS TWRP O BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003non-medicated skin protectants; non-medicated skin care products, namely, body lotions, soap, scrubs, toner, conditioner, exfoliators, skin clarifier, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, shampoos, sunscreens, skin care preparations, skin moisturizers.ACTIVE—
005medicated skin protectants; dietary supplements; medicated skin care products, namely, medicated skin care preparations.ACTIVE—
029food and beverages, namely, soy based food and beverages, namely soy powder for use as a food additive, soy based cream cheese, soy based sour cream, soy based dip, soy based milk, soy based soup mixes, and tofu desserts, fruit-based food beverage, potato based snack foods, fruit based snack food, vegetable based snack foods, milk based beverages containing fruit, seaweed drinks.ACTIVE—
030food and beverages, namely, tea, coffee, packaged tea, pastries, waffles, herbal food beverages, grain based food beverages, honey, food starch, wheat based snack foods, ice cream drinks.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance