USPTO serial 78574365
ICAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abbotsford, British Columbia, CA
Abbotsford, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Kathol
Neil F. Kathol Field Law604 1St Street S.W.Calgary, T2P1M7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Providing photographic processing services to insurance companies and their insureds | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | photographic services for insurance companies, namely providing insurance company clients with cameras for photographing automobile and other accident scenes, high value insured items and domestic posessions; providing an online-accessible electronic data base of phototgraphs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |