Drawing for RECOMMENDED BY LEADING AQUARISTS

USPTO serial 78574529

RECOMMENDED BY LEADING AQUARISTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECOMMENDED BY LEADING AQUARISTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031fish foodsACTIVEMar 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 24, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 22, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 16, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 10, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 31, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 26, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance