Drawing for PREMIER BAKERS

USPTO serial 78574664

PREMIER BAKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MALIK, ATTIYA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREMIER BAKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. West

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLPJONATHAN D W1999 AVE OF THE STARS FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4621

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bakery goods, namely bread, buns, English muffins, bagels, crumpets, cakes, pies, bagel dough-based ready-to-eat energy bars with fillings, and bagel dough-based snack bars with fillingsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 20, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 12, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 9, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Dec 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 30, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance