USPTO serial 78574688
C110
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C110?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia R. Adwere
CYNTHIA R ADWERE Howrey LLP1950 University Avenue, 4th FloorEast Palo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |