Drawing for DATA ENGINE

USPTO serial 78575175

DATA ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATA ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Pandiscio

MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RD STE 4WALTHAM, MA 02451-1933UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for use in detection and identification instruments using light sources and light detectors for detecting and identifying chemical substances; software for use in detection and identification instruments using light sources and light detectors for detecting and identifying biological substancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 19, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 19, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance