Drawing for VISUAL REPEATER

USPTO serial 78575328

VISUAL REPEATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUAL REPEATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin M. Zoltick

MARTIN M ZOLTICK ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SERVER APPLICATION PROGRAM FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF EVENT DATA COLLECTED, PROCESSED, ANALYZED, AND INTEGRATED FROM OTHER COMPUTER SERVERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 31, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 27, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 19, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 13, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 12, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 13, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 13, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance