Drawing for VISUAL DOCUMENT

USPTO serial 78575335

VISUAL DOCUMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUAL DOCUMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin M. Zoltick

MARTIN M ZOLTICK ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION FOR COLLECTION, PROCESSING, ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION OF METADATAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 27, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 26, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 1, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 1, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 10, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance