USPTO serial 78575472
SUPER MINI CAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPER MINI CAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Regina M. Corrigan
SUITER* WEST14301 FNB PKWY STE 220OMAHA, NE 68154-5299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | A COMBINATION OF OILFIELD WELLSITE TRAILERS THAT PROVIDE TEMPORARY ACCOMODATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |