Drawing for PAYCASHUSA PAYROLL & PREPAID DEBIT CARD STAR

USPTO serial 78575566

PAYCASHUSA PAYROLL & PREPAID DEBIT CARD STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAYCASHUSA PAYROLL & PREPAID DEBIT CARD STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie A. Birdwell

JULIE A BIRDWELL LUEDEKA, NEELY & GRAHAM PCPO BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37901-1871UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009magnetically encoded debit cardsABANDONEDSep 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 5, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance