Drawing for FULLERTON FLYERS

USPTO serial 78576293

FULLERTON FLYERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULLERTON FLYERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harris Tulchin

Harris Tulchin Harris Tulchin and Associates, Ltd.11377 W. Olympic BlvdSecond FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, sweaters, shorts, boxer shorts, jackets, shirts, t-shirts, golf shirts, polo shirts, tank tops, jerseys, nightshirts, warm-up suits, pants, tops, parkas, coats, cloth bibs, slacks, pajamas, bathing suits, underwear, gloves, ear muffs, scarves, and mittens; caps, visors and hats; clothing accessories, namely, belts and ties; head and wrist bands; aprons; socks and shoesACTIVE—
041Entertainment in the nature of baseball games; entertainment in the nature of baseball games, namely, scheduling organizing and conducting baseball games; educational services, namely, seminars in the field of baseball in the nature of baseball clinics; providing a website featuring information in the field of baseball and sporting events; entertainment services, namely, providing information in the fields of entertainment, music, arts, and cultural and civic events via electronic communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 29, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 13, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance