USPTO serial 78576362
ELEXA A WOMAN'S PERSPECTIVE BY TROJAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEXA A WOMAN'S PERSPECTIVE BY TROJAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Princeton, NJ
CHURCH & DWIGHT VIRGINIA CO., INC.
COLONIAL HEIGHTS, VA
Other trademarks owned by CHURCH & DWIGHT VIRGINIA CO., INC.
CHURCH & DWIGHT VIRGINIA CO., INC.
COLONIAL HEIGHTS, VA
Other trademarks owned by CHURCH & DWIGHT VIRGINIA CO., INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Schuman, Esq.
David J. Schuman, Esq. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.469 North Harrison StreetLaw DepartmentPrinceton, NJ 08558Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Massage oils; non-medicated pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes for hygienic use; non-medicated pre-moistened cosmetic wipes for hygienic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Personal lubricants; vaginal moisturizers and vaginal lubricants; genital vasodilators in the form of creams, oils, gel, lotions and potions for stimulating sexual arousal in males and females; desensitizing ointments; medicated pre-moistened towelettes; medicated pre-moistened wipes; disinfecting pre-moistened towelettes; disinfecting pre-moistened wipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Stimulation devices for aiding in sexual arousal and sexual performance; constrictor rings for maintaining penile rigidity; personal vibrators; flexible devices to be worn about the penis; penis enhancement rings; adult sexual aids, namely vibrating penis rings, accessories for massaging or vibrating human genitalia; rubber ring to be worn on the penis; penis ring massage apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CHURCH & DWIGHT VIRGINIA CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CHURCH & DWIGHT VIRGINIA CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ELEXA A WOMAN'S PERSPECTIVE BY TROJAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |