USPTO serial 78576899
Serial No. 78576899
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78576899?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-76187 Karlsruhe, DE
D-76187 Karlsruhe, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Barrese
Stephen R. Barrese DILWORTH & BARRESE, LLP333 EARLE OVINGTON BLVD STE 702UNIONDALE, NY 11553-3638UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | precious metals and their alloys; goods of precious metals and coated therewith, namely, watches, chronographs for use as watches, cases for watches and clocks, watch bands, watch straps, and dials for clock-and-watch-making; jewelry, precious stones, horological and chronometric instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal; household or kitchen utensils not of precious metal, namely, graters, sieves, spatulas, strainers, turners and skimmers; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; combs and cleaning sponges; brushes, except paint brushes, namely, washing brushes, dusting brushes, clothes brushes, dishwashing brushes, floor brushes, scrapping brushes, scrubbing brushes, shoe brushes, toilet brushes, tub brushes; material for brush-making; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, cleaning rags, cleaning cloths, cleaning pads, dusting cloths, impregnated cleaning cloths, mitts of fabric for cleaning, pre-moistened towelettes for cleaning; steel wool for cleaning; unworked or semi-worked glass, not including glass used in buildings; mugs, cups, plates, drinking glasses, beer mugs, beverage glassware; signboards of porcelain | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, t-shirts, vests, stockings, sweatshirts, socks, pyjamas, swimsuits, bathing trunks, neckerchiefs, scarves, sashes, belts, ties, jackets, trousers, shirts, coats, overalls, suspenders, underwear; footwear, namely, sports shoes, shoes and boots; headgear, namely, hats, caps, skull caps, baseball caps, visors, sun visors, and headbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, snuff, tobacco-surrogates not for medical purposes, cigars, cigarettes, lighters for smokers, matches, ashtrays, match boxes not of precious metal, cigarette holders not of precious metal, cigarette cases not of precious metal, cigarette boxes not of precious metal, cigarette papers, cigarette-rolling machines, pocket machines for rolling cigarettes, filter-tipped cigarettes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JANSEN, Manfred
- Other trademarks owned by JANSEN, Manfred
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |