USPTO serial 78577044
DIVX CONNECTED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVX CONNECTED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald, Esq.
Patrick Y. Ikehara KAUTH, POMEROY, PECK & BAILEY LLP2400 E. KATELLASUITE 1050ANAHEIM, CA 92806Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing, analysis and evaluation of networked devices and devices that share a common communications protocol for the purpose of certification | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |