USPTO serial 78580122
BOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4148266Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2012
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
KEITH E DANISH HISCOCK & BARCLAY LLPSEVEN TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for manufacture and treatment of mechanical and chemical pulp, cellulose, paper, paperboard, tissue and non-woven webs; machines for storage of wood and timber; machines for use in the wood processing and pulp and paper industries, namely, machines for debarking and treatment of bark, chippers, chip screens and chip washing machines; pressurized and conventional grinding machines; refiners for production of mechanical, chemimechanical and thermomechanical pulp; cellulose cooking machines; automated machines for holding and storing paper rolls, and parts thereof; air handling machines, namely, hoods and filters being paperboard and tissue machine parts for mechanical purposes; parts for all the aforesaid machines; heat exchangers and air blowers being parts of all of the above machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic and computer-controlled process control machines for use in the wood-processing and pulp and paper industries, namely, automated process control systems, comprising, microprocessor based hardware and software used to monitor and control the status and performance of the aforesaid machines and processors; data collection and control machines, namely, data processors; expert systems, namely, computers and computer software for gathering, evaluating and preserving data and for troubleshooting problems of production machinery, technology and processes, for use in the pulp and paper industry; optical sensors and scanners for measuring the qualities of paper, paper web and fibers in papermaking pulp; electric, hydraulic and pneumatic measuring instruments and controllers for measuring, recording and monitoring of pressure, humidity, moisture and temperature levels in solid and liquid substances; density measuring instruments for liquids and liquid suspensions; instruments for measuring properties of solids and liquid substances, for use in the paper and pulp industry, namely, consistency transmitters, kappa analyzers for measuring lignin content, analyzers for measuring softwood and hardwood fiber ratio, brightness analyzers, electric and electronic analyzers for measuring wood and non-wood pulp and fiber properties and essential chemical compounds of cooking liquor in various parts of the processes, namely, pulp residue lignin or Kappa, pulp brightness, pulp fiber and shives content, bleaching chemical residual, white liquor strength, cooking liquor residual and chemical components of the liquor in various recovery process stages; retention analyzers for measuring filler consistency of pulp and paper; electronic analyzers for measuring and controlling retention and cationic or anionic demand at paper machine wet end to meet the process runnability and paper quality targets; wood fiber dimension analyzers and non-wood fiber dimension analyzers, namely, fiber properties analyzers being optical analyzers and cameras; on-line and beach top analyzers comprising optical analyzers and cameras for measuring and analyzing fiber dimensions, shapes and vessels and shives and other non-wood species specific properties; pulp drainage analyzers and freeness analyzers for measuring the drainage rate of pulp suspension; pulp stock consistency meters; machines for measuring dry and solid contents of pulp and paper, namely, analyzers for measuring the consistency, thickness and amount of dry and solid contents in fiber mass suspension; machines for measuring pulp stock drainage rate; electronic heat content registers; instruments for measuring liquid and gas flows, namely, flow meters; machines for measuring ash content and brightness in paper; machines for measuring levels of bleaching chemical residues in pulp; pulp fiber length analyzers; kappa number analyzers for measuring the amount of chemicals needed in wood bleaching; machines comprising computer hardware and software for monitoring the operation, condition and runnability of machines and processes for use in chemical and mechanical pulping, paper making, paperboard processes, tissue making process and non-woven textile processes; computer hardware for controlling and monitoring pulp and paper manufacturing processes, namely, sensors, analyzers, monitors, controllers and regulators; apparatus for recording and transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, data processing equipment, computers, computer terminals, and computer software for controlling and regulating manufacturing processes for use in the pulp and paper industry; detectors of grammage, moisture, thickness, total ash, and color in a paper web; all the above goods for use in the paper and pulp industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Repair and installation of machines and parts of machines for use in the pulp and paper industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and industrial research services in the pulp and paper industry; technical planning, advisory and consulting services in the field of engineering for improving the mechanical performance of existing process lines in the pulp and paper industry and advisory and consulting services in the field of industrial engineering for improving the process performance of process lines in the pulp and paper industry; design and engineering services for others in the field of machines for use in the pulp and paper industry; product research and development services in the pulp and paper industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by METSO PAPER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by METSO PAPER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by METSO PAPER, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOOST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |