USPTO serial 78580532
FOR TRUE FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOR TRUE FREEDOM OF SPEECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
BRADLEY P HARTMAN STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1850 N CENTRAL AVE STE 2100PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4584UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cellular telephones and accessories, namely, wireless headsets, wireless earpieces, wireless smart headsets, wireless and USB (universal serial bus) multimode speakerphones, hand free devices for use with mobile telephones, microphones, and wireless voice interface devices; wireless communication equipment, devices and apparatuses, namely, wireless voice input and output devices; USB (universal serial bus) speakerphones with DSP (digital signal processing); USB (universal serial bus) headsets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |