Drawing for AXESSTEL CONNECTING THE WORLD NOW

USPTO serial 78580871

AXESSTEL CONNECTING THE WORLD NOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AXESSTEL CONNECTING THE WORLD NOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carlo F. Van den Bosch

CARLO F. VAN DEN BOSCH SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP650 TOWN CENTER DR FL 4COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1993UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication devices, namely, wireless telephonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 11, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 9, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 21, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 5, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 27, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 21, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 17, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance