Drawing for AXESSTEL

USPTO serial 78580875

AXESSTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AXESSTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carlo F. Van den Bosch

CARLO VA DEN BOSCH SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE4TH FLOORCOSTA MESA, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication devices, namely, wireless telephonesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Nov 18, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 18, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Nov 18, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2009TTBNCASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB
Sep 22, 2009IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Feb 28, 2007LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Feb 22, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 23, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance