USPTO serial 78581286
AMPTRONIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 3, 2009
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMPTRONIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Domino Wang
AMPTRONIX, INC. Domino Wang223 East Valley Blvd.Suite AAlhambra, CA 91801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Power inverters, Battery chargers, Battery desulfators, Computer peripherals, Computer Hardware* for use in association with marine, recreational vehicle, automobile, mobile products, and other related industrial systems* | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 7, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |