USPTO serial 78581376
ULTRAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN C. PAULS
BRIAN C PAULS LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN C PAULS919 S HARRISON STFORT WAYNE, IN 46815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | A POLYURETHANE FOAM FOR FABRICATION INTO OTHER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, AS A BUILDING MATERIAL; MATTRESSES, PILLOWS, FUTONS, BAR STOOL SEATS, FURNITURE CUSHIONS, AND SLEEPING BAGS; AND POLYURETHANE CARPET PADS AND POLYURETHANE BACKINGS FOR RUGS AND CARPETS | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |