USPTO serial 78581763
PUMP AND PRAISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PUMP AND PRAISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH I. KOHN
KENNETH I KOHN30500 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 410FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334-3179UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2004 |
| 035 | FRANCHISING; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2004 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION TO DAYCARE CENTERS, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, PARKS AND RECREACTION PROGRAMS, FITNESS CLUBS, AND HEALTH AND EXERCISE CENTERS, OFFICE AND WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENTS, SPORT'S TEAMS; EXERCISE ACTIVITY PROGRAMS; DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIAL; PROVIDING PRINTED LITERATURE; PROVIDING EXERCISE EQUIPMENT; PHYSICAL FITNESS TESTING SERVICES, NAMELY FITNESS EVALUATION | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |