Drawing for UNLOCK THE VALUE OF YOUR BRANDED CONTENT

USPTO serial 78582473

UNLOCK THE VALUE OF YOUR BRANDED CONTENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNLOCK THE VALUE OF YOUR BRANDED CONTENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the college, post-graduate and adult education levels; business training, and developing and conducting business trainingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 28, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance