USPTO serial 78582986
GONOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GONOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Abell
MATTHEW D ABELL HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80202-3921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADMINISTRATION OF A FEE-BASED MEMBERSHIP INCENTIVE REWARDS AND CUSTOMER FREQUENCY/LOYALTY PROGRAM ENABLING MEMBERS TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS AND INFORMATION ON AIR AND GROUND TRAVEL, TRAVEL INSURANCE, CAR RENTALS, EMERGENCY ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE, RESORT AND HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS, CRUISES AND VACATION PACKAGES, AMUSEMENT/THEME PARKS AND ATTRACTIONS, LEISURE AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, SHOPPING, AND RESTAURANT DINING THROUGH USE OF AN ONLINE INTERNET PORTAL; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY MEANS OF OFFERING DISCOUNTS ON HOTELS, RESORT ACCOMMODATIONS, RESTAURANTS, AIRFARES, ATTRACTIONS, TOUR PACKAGES, CAR RENTALS, AND OTHER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OFFERED BY RETAIL AND SERVICE MERCHANTS THROUGH USE OF AN ONLINE INTERNET PORTAL; ADMINISTRATION OF A FEE-BASED MEMBERSHIP INCENTIVE REWARDS AND CUSTOMER FREQUENCY OR LOYALTY PROGRAM BY PROVIDING AND ARRANGING FOR TICKET RESERVATIONS FOR ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS FOR MEMBERS OF AN INCENTIVE REWARDS AND CUSTOMER FREQUENCY/LOYALTY PROGRAM; ADMINISTRATION OF A FEE-BASED MEMBERSHIP INCENTIVE REWARDS AND CUSTOMER FREQUENCY OR LOYALTY PROGRAM BY ARRANGING FOR CONCIERGE SERVICES FOR MEMBERS OF AN INCENTIVE REWARDS AND CUSTOMER FREQUENCY/LOYALTY PROGRAM IN A WIDE VARIETY OF FIELDS COMPRISED OF MAKING REQUESTED PERSONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND RESERVATIONS AND PROVIDING CUSTOMER-SPECIFIC INFORMATION TO MEET INDIVIDUAL NEEDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES FOR MEMBERS OF A CUSTOMER FREQUENCY OR LOYALTY PROGRAM, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR GROUND AND AIR TRANSPORTATION; PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR MEMBERS CONCERNING TRAVEL AND TRAVEL-RELATED TOPICS; PROVIDING TRAVEL INFORMATION FOR MEMBERS VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES FOR MEMBERS, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LODGING AND ACCOMMODATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |