Drawing for SUCCESS POD

USPTO serial 78583234

SUCCESS POD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUCCESS POD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlen L. Olsen

Arlen L. Olsen Schmeiser, Olsen & WattsSuite 30222 Century Hill DriveLatham, NY 12110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded video tapes featuring instruction on achieving success in professional life, business management, interpersonal skills, and time management for the medical and pharmaceutical communityACTIVE—
016Books and teaching aids, namely, workbooks, and printed tests, all featuring instruction on achieving success in professional life, business management, interpersonal skills, and time management for the medical and pharmaceutical communityACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting web-based training and workshops in the fields of weight loss management, professional life achievement, business management, interpersonal skills, and time management, all having a success-oriented setting for the medical and pharmaceutical communityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 26, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 12, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance