Drawing for PETAGE

USPTO serial 78584116

PETAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shauna M. Wertheim, Esq.

SHAUNA M WERTHEIM ESQ ROBERTS ABOKHAIR & MARDULA LLC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 1000RESTON, VA 20191-5332UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Counseling in the field of pet health maintenance, namely, assessing physiological impact of dietary and lifestyle choices for household petsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 31, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 28, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance