Drawing for SCI-PODS

USPTO serial 78584926

SCI-PODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCI-PODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Marsh

ROBERT E MARSH CORPORATE COUNSEL GROUP LLP4144 PENNSYLVANIA AVEKANSAS CITY, MO 64111-3003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028children's educational and scientific experiment kits not including any integrated circuit components or devicesACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 22, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Oct 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 24, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Apr 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 22, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Oct 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Apr 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATEDโ€”
Sep 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Aug 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Aug 31, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Aug 31, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Aug 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Aug 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Aug 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Aug 29, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Mar 29, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Jan 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Dec 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Dec 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Dec 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Sep 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance