Drawing for VERITOC

USPTO serial 78584966

VERITOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERITOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra J. Horne

ALEXANDRA J HORNE WHITE & CASE LLP3000 EL CAMINO REAL 5 PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE EMBEDDED IN OPTICAL DATA STORAGE DISKS TO DETECT AND PROTECT AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS, MODIFICATION, TRANSFER OR COPYING OF DIGITAL AUDIO; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO MANAGE DIGITAL AUDIO FILES; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO IDENTIFY AND VALIDATE DIGITAL AUDIOABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 23, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 23, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 28, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance