CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PRISCO MUNDET

USPTO serial 78584989

PRISCO MUNDET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRISCO MUNDET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah L. Lively

Deborah L. Lively Thompson & Knight LLPSuite 15001722 Routh StreetDallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit drinks and carbonated soft drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance