USPTO serial 78585148
HAWAIIAN SPRINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALIK, ATTIYA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAWAIIAN SPRINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PENNY R. SLICER, REG. NO. 34,017
PENNY R SLICER REG NO 34 017 STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT, STE 2800STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT DRINKS, HERBAL TEAS, SPORTS DRINKS AND OTHER BEVERAGES; FOOD PRODUCTS, INCLUDING ORGANIC AND NATURAL FOODS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTS AND NEUTRICEUTICALS; SPA PRODUCTS, BATH PRODUCTS, ESSENTIAL OILS, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, BODY CARE PRODUCTS AND NAIL CARE PRODUCTS; COSMETICS; SCENTED OILS AND FRAGRANCES; HERBAL PRODUCTS; AROMATHERAPY PRODUCTS; HOMEOPATHIC REMEDIES; AND DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |