USPTO serial 78585224
GOLD STANDARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 29, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with GOLD STANDARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ORLAND PARK, IL, US
Spring House, PA, US
Spring House, PA, US
Spring House, PA, US
GLANBIA PERFORMANCE NUTRITION LIMITED
KILKENNY, IE
Other trademarks owned by GLANBIA PERFORMANCE NUTRITION LIMITED
GLANBIA NUTRITIONALS (IRELAND) LIMITED
KILKENNY, IE
Other trademarks owned by GLANBIA NUTRITIONALS (IRELAND) LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Burke
John K. Burke Vedder Price P.C.222 N. LaSalle Street - 24th FloorChicago, IL 60601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (( Vitamins, dietary herbal and mineral supplements, and )) nutritional dietary supplements, * all of the aforementioned goods being for human consumption * | ACTIVE | Oct 9, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PAULIUS, TOM
- Other trademarks owned by Smart Choice Food Sales, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Smart Choice Food Sales, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Smart Choice Food Sales, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by GLANBIA PERFORMANCE NUTRITION LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GLANBIA NUTRITIONALS (IRELAND) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GOLD STANDARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |