Drawing for PMED

USPTO serial 78585551

PMED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PMED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Ungaro

Jane Ungaro Pfizer Inc.150 East 42nd Street, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for human and veterinary use for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular, dental and periodontal, dermatologic, endocrine and metabolic, gastrointestinal, genetic, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, lymphatic, osteologic, neurologic, ophthalmic, psychiatric, reproductive system, respiratory tract, renal, and urinary tract diseases and disorders; pharmaceutical preparations for human and veterinary use, namely, analgesics, anesthetics, antibiotics, anti-cancer preparations, antihistamines, anti-infectives, anti-inflammatories, anti-migraines, anti-parasitics, antivirals, insulin, hormones, hormone antagonists, enzyme inhibitors, steroids, vaccines; adjuvants for vaccines; diagnostic preparations for medical purposesACTIVE—
010medical and veterinary delivery devices for pharmaceutical and diagnostic preparations, namely, injectors with or without needles and jet injectors, and parts and fittings thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 16, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 13, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 28, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 6, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 5, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance