Drawing for WDP

USPTO serial 78585582

WDP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WDP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory L. Maag

Gregory L. Maag Conley Rose, P.C.P.O. Box 3267Houston, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Equipment for drilling oil, gas and geothermal wells, namely, metal drill pipe, metal pipe joints, metal pipe collars, and heavy weight metal drill pipeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 28, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 11, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 6, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 21, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance