USPTO serial 78585749
AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Owner
AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
HERPERIA, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
HERPERIA, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
Cuyahoga Falls, OH, US
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
American Polish Lowland Sheepdog Club, Inc.
Herperia, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by American Polish Lowland Sheepdog Club, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander R. Folk
Alexander R. Folk Alexander R. Folk, Attorney at LawBox 67128Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44222United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the protection and advancement of the Polish Lowland Sheepdog breed by encouraging quality breeding of purebred Polish Lowland Sheepdogs, encouraging the organization of independent local American Polish Lowland Sheepdog specialty clubs, maintaining the designation of a national parent breed club for the Polish Lowland Sheepdog breed, representing the Polish Lowland Sheepdog breed with a national association of dog owners, breeders, and enthusiasts, encouraging members and breeders to accept the standard of the breed as approved by a national association of dog owners, breeders, and enthusiasts as the only standard of excellence by which the Polish Lowland Sheepdog should be judged, encouraging sportsman-like competition at dog shows and obedience trials, maintaining a registry of breeders, dog handlers, and kennels for the Polish Lowland Sheepdog, promoting and encouraging education and information relating to the Polish Lowland Sheepdog breed, promoting responsible and ethical dog ownership, care, training and breeding delivered by means of global computer networks | ACTIVE | Jan 14, 1999 |
| 041 | Conducting sanctioned matches, specialty shows, and obedience trials for dogs under the rules and regulations of a national association of dog owners, breeders, and enthusiasts | ACTIVE | Jan 14, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
- Other trademarks owned by American Polish Lowland Sheepdog Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named AMERICAN POLISH LOWLAND SHEEPDOG CLUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |