Drawing for SURPASSING THE REST WITH ONLY THE BEST, ARTICHOKES AND FRESH VEGETABLES!

USPTO serial 78585777

SURPASSING THE REST WITH ONLY THE BEST, ARTICHOKES AND FRESH VEGETABLES!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3065838Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SURPASSING THE REST WITH ONLY THE BEST, ARTICHOKES AND FRESH VEGETABLES!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Baldwin

Timothy J. Baldwin Noland, Hamerly, Etienne & HossPO Box 2510Salinas, CA 93902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Distributorship services in the field of agricultural products, namely fresh and ready to eat productsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 7, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 26, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 22, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 10, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance