USPTO serial 78585913
JUNGLENUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUNGLENUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Andrew Goldstein
MARK ANDREW GOLDSTEIN SOCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP310 N WESTLAKE BLVD STE 120WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Postcards and stickers, newspaper comic strips, drawings, graphic art reproductions, graphic novels | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Bean bag dolls, plush toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring short cartoons, feature-length cartoons and digital comic strips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JUNGLENUTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JUNGLENUTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Guetta, Patrick
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named JUNGLENUTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |